At the outset here, I need to say that
I oppose sexism and misogyny anywhere in public, perhaps most especially when
it comes camouflaged in an internet joke.
There is no place for this in today’s society. That said, as a male, I do not place females
on any sort of pedestal because we are, in the eyes of the law and of common
decency, equals.
I have a problem, however, when it is
used as a battering-ram to silence reasoned and sensible debate. When this happens, we end up with a situation
where one side seeks to dominate the other – much as happens in some
male-dominated societies around the world.
There is NO place for that, so there is no place for the vice versa
view.
With all of that said, I turn to the events in the
National Parliament of Australia, specifically the House of Representatives. There are
laws that govern what can be said there, much as there is everywhere else –
which require the topic to be debated, rather than the person who originates
the debate. The real difference is that,
in Parliament, things can – and should – be said under Parliamentary Privilege
that cannot be repeated elsewhere.
As a result, we – the people who elect
our representatives – expect and demand robust debate of issues that lead to
good governance that improves laws that are supposed to protect us all and,
indeed, the Australian national identity.
We expect that Australian elected representatives will get to the heart
of issues, all issues, no matter how sensitive or controversial. We demand that our representatives do this,
in OUR interest.
What have we seen in Federal
Parliament of late? Accusations of
sexism, misogyny and who knows what else.
Why can’t we allow robust debate of issues that affect us? Why is our National Parliament so quagmired
in debate of issues that resolve into the petty politics of each individual
political party?
I watched “Question Time” yesterday
(Tuesday, 9 October 2012) when the Leader of the Opposition tabled a legitimate
motion. The response by the PM – and the
speakers from the government – was, for the most part, based on killing the
messenger because of the message. As
part of this, I saw character assassination, allegations of misogyny and sexism
that did nothing but derail the debate – rather than dealing with THE debate.
What happened today (Wednesday, 10 October 2012)? Quite apart from the Speaker of Parliament resigning from that exhalted position, a continuation of allegations of sexism and misogyny that had so consumed the Labour government yesterday! The fundamental issue remains suppressed by the vested interests of those who have no intention of debating the real issues.
No, I do not want to see any
Parliament in Australia degenerate into the fisticuffs that we see, from time
to time, in other democracies that are, shall we say, more robust in their own
particular points of view. What we see instead, however, is
the next worst thing and it does nothing to encourage any of us who are
obliged, by law, to cast a vote at each election.
It seems to me that our Prime Minister
needs to heed that time-honoured call to “toughen up, Princess”. Politics is a rough-and-tumble affair and, as
another old saying goes, "if you can’t stand the heat, get out of the
kitchen"! Make way for others who can
stand up to that “rough and tumble” situation, in the interest of the rest of
us who are confused as hell about who to vote for next year.
By all means, debate the issues. By NO means, debate or attack the person –
that is the first lesson taught in High School debating but it seems that many
of those that we elect have forgotten this basic tenet of debate. We want our politicians to come to grips with
the issues and to debate them in the most robust terms possible and we expect
this no matter whether our particular representative is male or female because
we are supposed to have gender equality in this country.
If this cannot be exercised in our
National Parliament, how can we (the ones who have to follow the law and the lead of our responsible, elected leaders) be expected to follow the path that
promotes gender equality?
Federally, the Australian Labour Party
is on the cusp of a very unlikely victory next year, courtesy of the Leader of
the Opposition who is a loose cannon of the worst sort. If the Liberal Party replaces him, the ALP
will lose in a worse way than happened in Queensland. And, yes, I will vote for that. I'm a long time Liberal supporter who has
serious doubts about Tony Abbott but I'll never vote Labour, so Gillard will
not get my vote anyway – but there are many others who are still confused by
BOTH sides of politics.
To all our elected
representatives – male or female – I say “toughen up Princess” and work in OUR
interests, not your own self-interest.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Feel free to add a comment of your own